Multiple Complaints Expose And Prove Bogus IRS ComputerCoding To Fraudulently Enforce Income Tax
These two reports explain the steps the IRS takes to input bogus codes into their internal computer systems in order to create fraudulent federal income tax assessments.
The reports describe the step by step process the IRS follows in order to systematically alter computerized IRS records in order to fraudulently enforce the federal income tax on targeted individuals the IRS typically classifies as "non-filers." The report explains how IRS personnel utilize the Examination Return Control System ("ERCS") and the Audit Information Management System ("AIMS") to bypass security protocols within the agency's highly secure Individual Master File ("IMF") database computer system.
The reports document how specific command and override codes are input into IRS computer systems—specifically a "424" command combined with a"036" push code—in order to fraudulently trigger a series of automated computer entries. The series of automated computer entries mimic circumstances that justify a legitimate federal income tax assessment when in fact those circumstances do not exist in reality. The mimicked entries falsely utilize a digital computer document code of "10" that falsely portrays a scenario whereby the targeted citizen filed a "Form 1040A" tax return and requested that the IRS calculate their income tax for them when in fact, the citizen neither filed a "Form 1040A" nor requested that the IRS calculate their income tax for them. Creating this fraudulently derived "Form 1040A" tax return then allows the IRS to enter a fraudulently derived income tax deficiency using a "300" transaction code ("TC 300"), a step the IRS's "IMF" software would otherwise reject without the citizen actually submitting a real "Form 1040A" to the IRS and the citizen actually requesting that the IRS calculate the citizen's income tax. It goes without saying that the IRS portraying citizen circumstances in its internal computer systems that don't actually exist in reality is fraud and theft plain and simple.
Furthermore, the accompanying FOIA Administrative Appeal asserts that administrators at the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration ("TIGTA") have actively concealed these practices and refused to investigate, likely for fear of even greater disclosures to a public that is already suspicious of government conduct. The appeal claims that TIGTA fraudulently invoked FOIA exemptions to withhold documents concerning their refusal to investigate these alleged IRS computer crimes over a twelve-year span.
Source Documents
Conclusion
Stay tuned!
